Home Documents Images Message Board
(Use your browser's back button to return to the page that you were previously viewing.)
| NTSB Identification: LAX99LA034. The docket is stored in the (offline) NTSB Imaging System. |
| Accident occurred Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at ORINDA, CA |
| Aircraft: Cessna 152, registration: N48201 |
| Injuries: 1 Serious |
| Event: 20001211X11461 Status: Final Report Approved On Friday, February 16, 2001 |
| NTSB Preliminary Narrative (6120.19A) |
| On November 18, 1998, at 2030 hours Pacific standard time, a Cessna 152, N48201, collided with a tree during a forced landing following a loss |
| of engine power near Orinda, California. The airplane was destroyed. The private pilot, the sole occupant, suffered serious injuries. The flight, |
| conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, originated at the Corning, California, airport at 1900, and was en route to the Hayward |
| Airport. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. |
| The pilot reported that he had been leading another aircraft as a flight of two. The second aircraft, a Cessna 172, was having electrical |
| problems, and all contact between the two aircraft was lost. The pilot of the accident aircraft reported that he leveled off at 2,000 feet agl and |
| configured the airplane for cruise flight with the throttle set at 2,000 rpm. After "two to three minutes" the rpm decreased to between 500 and |
| 800 rpm. The pilot didn't notice any engine vibration, but reported that it sounded as if "someone suddenly stuffed cotton in your ears." He |
| stated that the engine never "coughed or sputtered." Approximately 2 minutes later, the engine lost power completely. He reported that he |
| attempted to restart the engine and transmitted a "MAYDAY." The pilot stated that the squelch on his intercom was not working, causing his |
| microphone not to work. Another pilot overheard and transmitted his calls to Oakland Approach. |
| A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector from the Oakland Flight Standards District Office responded to the accident site. She reported |
| that she drained fuel from the gascolator and tank sumps and found the fuel to be contaminated with water at a ratio of approximately 35 |
| percent water to 65 percent fuel. She stated that draining the gascolator also yielded grass and other debris. The carburetor bowl contained 50 |
| milliliters of water, 2 milliliters of fuel, and 10 milliliters of an unidentified green fungus-like substance. |
| The fuel dispensing logs at Corning Airport were reviewed and indicated that the pilot received 17.1 gallons of fuel before takeoff. The fuel truck |
| was quarantined immediately following the accident. The fuel was sumped and was found to be within the required specifications. |
| The inspector reported that the aircraft had been tied down on the ramp at Corning Airport for about 3 weeks before the accident. The owner of |
| an airport paint shop had been a prospective buyer for the aircraft and had been inspecting it, but had not flown it during the 3-week period. A |
| prebuy inspection had been conducted on September 9, 1998, at Corning Airport, during which 57 discrepancies were noted by the examining |
| Airframe and Powerplant mechanic, who is also the holder of an inspection authorization. A copy of that list is included in this file. |
| During a postcrash examination of the aircraft, the inspector noted that the right fuel tank cap gasket did not seal. She further reported that |
| neither cap gasket appeared visibly deteriorated. She noted no rust or sediment inside either fuel tank. |
| After adding 1 gallon of Avgas downstream of the firewall fuel filter, the inspector ran the engine for less than 1 minute. She noted no abnormal |
| sounds or discrepancies with the engine or engine gauges. |
| Visual and distillation tests were conducted with the fuel samples at Saybolt, Inc., Laboratories in Martinez, California, in the presence of two |
| FAA inspectors. The laboratory personnel indicated that the contamination was most likely a Naptha-based substance, which is a common |
| gasoline additive for cleaning injectors and is also found in paint. Visual analysis confirmed algae-based contamination from the carburetor bowl |
| sample, and significant particulant contamination of all three samples, including sand and dirt-based matter. A copy of the laboratory report is |
| appended to this file. |
| In a recorded interview, the pilot reported to the FAA inspector that he didn't remember if he had drained fuel from the tank sumps or gascolator |
| during the preflight. He stated that after performing a preflight and "under assurance from those in attendance that the plane was in good |
| shape," he was given instruction in how to use the aircraft radio, which was missing its "tens" digit. The pilot reported that he had conducted a |
| carburetor heat check during his run-up, but had not "gotten much out of it." He further stated that he had planned to rent the accident aircraft |
| on October 5, 1998, but had decided not to fly it because he "just had a bad feeling about it." |
| NTSB Final Narrative (6120.4) |
| While in cruise flight at 2,000 feet agl, the aircraft began losing power. About 2 minutes later, the engine lost power completely and the pilot was |
| not able to restart the engine. The aircraft collided with a tree during the subsequent forced landing. The FAA inspector who responded to the |
| site reported that she drained fuel from the tank sumps and gascolator and found the fuel to be contaminated with water at a ratio of |
| approximately 35 percent water to 65 percent fuel. She reported that draining the gascolator also yielded grass and other debris. The |
| carburetor contained about 50 milliliters of water, 2 milliliters of fuel and 8 milliliters of an unknown mold-like substance. The inspector reported |
| that the right fuel tank gasket did not seal. The pilot had received 17 gallons of fuel before takeoff, and reported that the aircraft had been tied |
| down on the ramp for about 3 weeks before the flight. The fuel truck was tested and was found to be within specifications. The pilot stated |
| that he did not remember if he had drained fuel from the tank sumps or gascolator during the preflight. |
| NTSB Probable Cause Narrative |
| A loss of engine power due to water contamination of the fuel. A factor was the pilot's inadequate preflight, during which he neglected to note |
| the contamination, and the dark night which made it difficult to select a landing spot. |
| Occurrences and Sequence of Events |
| Occurrence: 1, LOSS OF ENGINE POWER(TOTAL) - NONMECHANICAL |
| Phase of Operation: CRUISE |
| Sequence of Events for Occurrence Number: 1 |
| 1 ( Factor ) FUEL SYSTEM, CAP / LOOSE / (0) |
| 2 ( Cause ) FLUID, FUEL / CONTAMINATION, WATER / (0) |
| 3 (Finding) FLUID, FUEL / CONTAMINATION, OTHER THAN WATER / (0) |
| 4 ( Factor ) AIRCRAFT PREFLIGHT / INADEQUATE / PILOT IN COMMAND |
| Occurrence: 2, FORCED LANDING |
| Phase of Operation: EMERGENCY DESCENT/LANDING |
| Occurrence: 3, IN FLIGHT COLLISION WITH OBJECT |
| Phase of Operation: EMERGENCY DESCENT/LANDING |
| Sequence of Events for Occurrence Number: 3 |
| 5 (Finding) OBJECT / TREE(S) / (0) |
| 6 ( Factor ) LIGHT CONDITION / DARK NIGHT / (0) |
Home Documents Images Message Board
(Use your browser's back button to return to the page that you were previously viewing.)